Most of the media is missing the most
important question in the matter of Edward Snowden.
Snowden now is on a worldwide tour of
countries that hate the United States, carrying four laptop computers
filled with secret information about the nation's intelligence
gathering operations.
This guy has little education and not
much sense, as far as we can tell from news stories.
So how did he get a top secret security
clearance and access to important information related to national
security?
Isn't that just a little bit important?
Instead it is all about “metadata”
and the like. Various people on both sides of the political fence
seem to think he is a national hero.
I'm not willing to shower him with
accolades just yet.
For one thing, it isn't clear whether
his information shows that the law is too permissive, or whether it
shows that the Obama regime isn't following laws that are fair and
reasonable.
Even if it is the latter case, what is
the benefit to Americans from turning over that information to our
enemies?
He could have gone to congressional
oversight committees with it, for example. That way, the information
could have been kept confidential yet the administration's use of the
information could have been investigated.
Was the information used for political
activities, or to protect the nation?
This nation must gather intelligence.
Virtually all nations do.
Liberals don't like intelligence
gathering and in the 1970s they succeeded in reducing our ability to
conduct it, which probably was a contributing factor in the attacks
on America on Sept. 11, 2001.
Now, Russia, China and
who-knows-who-else have our secrets and, with the traitor
organization Wikileaks involved, it is likely that everyone in the
world will have access to them.
Snowden clearly wasn't working in the
best interests of the United States. What we need to know is who he
was working for and how he got his hands on our secrets.
No comments:
Post a Comment